The Hidden Life of Trees: Photography in Painting

Photography in drawing and painting can be a polarizing issue

an incredibly valuable tool

the danger lies in:

the tool shaping your work

verses

you shaping the work with the tool


I am not condemning the partial, or even full use, of photos to create

When it comes to final image construction there should only be one rule

ANY MEANS POSSIBLE


What I am discussing is visual knowledge and understanding

From what library does a person pull information from to form. opinions, ideas, theories, and motivations?

The world of symbols

OR

the world?


Human engineered technology has a unique characteristic

that which was made to help

also

has the capacity to bind

take for example these three images:

Portrait comparison.jpg

outside of opinion

What can be said about them?

  1. they are images viewed on a screen

  2. the subject is of yours truly

  3. they are all symbolic representations of reality

The difference between them lies in the

complexity and design

of the

SYMBOLS

not

in their perceived level of

reality


Images are always communicating information

As visual artists we work in the deliberate transmission of information



Understanding the mechanics of complex symbol construction

aka

making an image look real

is a noble pursuit

but it is

not

an ARTISTIC pursuit


Complex symbol construction

does not equal

Artistic skill


Once we identify what we are looking at

we stop studying it.

we would never get through our day

lost in wonder and the

infinite beauty

of the

universe

we only stop to truly

SEE

something if we believe it holds an inherent value to us.


PHOTOGRAPHY

PRESENTS

only a finite amount of information

in its replication of reality


When we set out to

PAINT or DRAW

we are asking questions

whether we know it or not


Asking questions from a

PHOTOGRAPH

WILL LEAVE YOU

APART

from the world you are studying


Asking questions from

LIFE

WILL LEAVE YOU

A

PART

OF THIS WORLD


The world, life, and we are in

flux

valuable information is packed in the milliseconds of

movement

If we actively wish to study or represent something that is constantly

changing

when operating from a place that is

stagnate

so

The question becomes:


WHAT INFORMATION ARE WE MISSING?

How much more do we register visually at a subconscious level? What role do the other senses play in a drawing or painting? Run the tests, collect the data…let me know